Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of
resources.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people argue that it is pointless to spend money on the protection of wild animals
because we humans have no need for them. I completely disagree with this point of view.
In my opinion, it is absurd to argue that wild animals have no place in the 21st century. I
do not believe that planet Earth exists only for the benefit of humans, and there is
nothing special about this particular century that means that we suddenly have the right
to allow or encourage the extinction of any species. Furthermore, there is no compelling
reason why we should let animals die out. We do not need to exploit or destroy every last
square metre of land in order to feed or accommodate the world’s population. There is
plenty of room for us to exist side by side with wild animals, and this should be our aim.
I also disagree with the idea that protecting animals is a waste of resources. It is usually
the protection of natural habitats that ensures the survival of wild animals, and most
scientists agree that these habitats are also crucial for human survival. For example,
rainforests produce oxygen, absorb carbon
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that people make Has this been a positive or negative development 67
- The two figures below show the rate of criminal convictions among men and women of different ages in the UK and the proportion of male and female prison inmates in the British prison system summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fea 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 196.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7806122449 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50111907482 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 506.74238477 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1746250564 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.38176352705 297% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280554514918 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104601175797 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878352059883 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869657917837 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776554350214 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 78.4519038076 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.