The reading passage explains some theories about the sources of the strange sounds heard by Russian submarines. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all.
First, the writer claims that the sources of strange noise in the ocean might be male and female orca whales that tried to communicate with each other. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that the orca whales live on the surface of the ocean in contrast to the submarines which move in deep of the ocean. Therefore, they could not hear the sounds of the whales.
Furthermore, the author asserts that this sound might related to the giant squids who live deep in the ocean. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that the submarines heard the sounds only a specific time period in the past. Due to the fact that the squids live now in the oceans, if the sound created by these animals, the submarines should hear the sound nowadays.
Finally, the reading passage believes that the sound could release by some military technology of other countries. The reading, on the other hand, makes the argument that the source of the sound moved around with such speed pace that even the submarines built with new technology cannot move at that speed. So, the sound resource could not relate to a manmade technology.
The reading passage explains some theories about the sources of the strange sounds heard by Russian submarines. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all.
First, the writer claims that the sources of strange noise in the ocean might be male and female orca whales that tried to communicate with each other. On the contrary, the professor dismisses this idea due to the fact that the orca whales live on the surface of the ocean in contrast to the submarines which move in deep of the ocean. Therefore, they could not hear the sounds of the whales.
Furthermore, the author asserts that this sound might relate to the giant squids who live deep in the ocean. Conversely, the speaker underlines the fact that the submarines heard the sounds only a specific time period in the past. Due to the fact that the squids live now in the oceans, if the sound created by these animals, the submarines should hear the sound nowadays.
Finally, the reading passage believes that the sound could release by some military technology of other countries. The reading, on the other hand, makes the argument that the source of the sound moved around with such speed pace that even the submarines built with new technology cannot move at that speed. So, the sound resource could not relate to manmade technology.
- Sea Cows 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 76
- Sending humans to Mars 3
- The reading passage explains some theories about the sources of the strange sounds heard by Russian submarines However the lecturer finds all the ideas discussed by the reading passage dubious and suggests some evidence to refute them all First the writer 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87288135593 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32149257577 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512711864407 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4679242433 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.545454545 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418117561711 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162313995368 0.0996497079465 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.206725368902 0.0662205650399 312% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290392601179 0.162205337803 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.323194843811 0.0443174109184 729% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.