The children who grow up in a poor family can deal with problems in adult life than those brought up by wealthy parents To what extend do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

The children who grow up in a poor family can deal with problems in adult life than those brought up by wealthy parents. To what extend do you agree or disagree?

In recent years, problem-solving skill has been required in every aspects of our daily life. The idea that, impoverished adolescents can face with issues better than those who was pampered by high-income families remains a source of controversy. In my opinion, I believe that money can open more opportunities for children to enhance their skills.

Education is the shortest way to success, and so it may costs a lot. Affluent parents are capable of paying tuition fees for their children to follow higher education. Moreover, they can also choose reputable schools with modern facilities, highly qualified teachers. Those schools always provide practical opportunities to their students whereas normal schools are struggle with finance to organize activities. Simultaneously, teenagers can reach the problem thoroughly by adopting their knowledge at school and experiences in real life.

There is no denying about the power of money. Adolescents will always have opportunities to seek support from other people, especially those who are famous or successful in some departments. Further more, children can create a close relationship with them. I believe that the more relationships are made the more profit will be earned. For instance, there are some educational events which only high-class families can join. These workshops are managed by many brilliant professors, doctors, scientists,… in order to enhance people’s knowledge and skills

In conclusion, I would argue that there are plenty of advantages for rich juveniles to overcome obstacles. Although money is not everything but money is the most power technique to develop yourself.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-03 DO NGOC PHUONG KHOA 84 view
2020-08-31 DO NGOC PHUONG KHOA 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 503, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , …
...rilliant professors, doctors, scientists,… in order to enhance people’s knowledge ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60956175299 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03500421994 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673306772908 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.5386816411 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.06120827912 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163805541407 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500915430186 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438577099546 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909722029914 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0609725277636 0.056905535591 107% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.