Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport, while other people think that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In contemporary society, the importance of physical and mental health to be a sports winner has been a controversial issue in many parts of the world. It is argued that physical strength is the main element to be successful in the sports field. Nevertheless, I am inclined that this one should be combined with spiritual insurance which is indispensable in sports.
On the one hand, sports require contestants never giving up throughout their routes, which means that sporters have to live in a good health background. For example, to be allowed to enrol in sports competition, contestants have to ensure that they do not withstand health problems, such as cardiovascular or bone problems to avoid being injured and taking risks while playing. In addition, sports are related to cooperation ability and flexible body; therefore, players have to be under the harsh training of physical health to make sure that they can meet these basic needs to succeed. Indeed, people will stop continuing physical practice due to the limitation of health.
On the other hand, if trainers cannot foster a competitive spirit or even a win-at-all-costs attitude, the sportspeople who they train may lack the necessary motivation to work hard and succeed. Also, encouragement can help people to be more self-assured. When they are ready, they can take their chance; when they suffer from feelings of worrying, loneliness, and anxiety, they will miss these chance to win. For example, when a football player feels that he lags behind others in professional ability, his legs feel like jelly and have no power even to walk.
In conclusion, while physical strength makes perfect sense to help players become more flexible, cooperated, and persisted, I claim that mental health should not be ignored due to certain aforementioned reasons. I suggest that people should have a balance between the two.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | Shinycorn122 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | mike123 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Đặng Quỳnh Như | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of resources 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 73
- Some people feel that certain workers like nurses doctors and teachers are undervalued and should be paid more when other people like film actors or company bosses are paid huge sums of money that are out of proportion to the importance of the work that t 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 20
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...e of physical and mental health to be a sports winner has been a controversial issue i...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17049180328 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92622537539 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4367609869 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174161670053 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682862447223 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521457758744 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11096877145 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404204142259 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.