The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006.
The bar chart compares six countries with the world in terms of numbers of students per class in 2006, divided into two categories: elementary students and lower middle ones.
Overall, South Korea had the largest class sizes and class sizes in primary schools were generally smaller than those in lower secondary schools.
There were 31 students per class in both South Korea and Japan’s primary schools, while typical UK and Mexican elementary classes consisted of 25 children. In contrast, the figures for Denmark and Iceland were considerably smaller, which were just below the world average of 19.
With respect to junior high school, the average number of students in a South Korean class was 41, which was more than twice the size of the world average class. While the respective figures for Japan and Mexico were 33 and 34, there were only 24 students per class in the United Kingdom. Remarkably, Denmark and Italy were the only two countries whose class sizes were smaller than the world average, with 19 and 17 kids, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-02 | bachbaochau | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-26 | ngoctham4344 | 67 | view |
| 2020-05-13 | Thang Tran | 42 | view |
| 2020-04-23 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 67 | view |
| 2020-04-23 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 84
- Task 2 In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, while, in contrast, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04022988506 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35725381065 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.2945668005 43.030603864 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.395553120219 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.187774619975 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997332449246 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241422688206 0.15604864568 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664897901059 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.