It was predicted that people in the 21 century would have much more time than in the past. To what extent has this prediction come true?
It was supposed by ancestors that humanity in the next century would probably have significantly more spare time compared to them. Personally, I hold the view, that this forecast of the present did not happen by reason of the hectic pace of life and new distractions.
To begin with, people’s life has become by far hectic compared to the old days. The main reason for these sweeping changes is, apparently, advanced technology which put a strain on a human being. What I mean by this, people aim to move with the time learning how to maintain or work with cutting-edge machines in order to make a living as devices are fulfilling a lot of workflows. Furthermore, it was assumed that robotic mechanisms would relieve pressure on humanity replacing them on many manual works but on the contrary people work harder with tireless computers to accomplish more workload in less time. For instance, creating a mould no longer is a sophisticated process that used to take a couple of weeks; currently, it only requires a 3D scanner, well-educated employees with the latest knowledge of 3D technology and couple hours of work.
Moreover, in the present appear to was been created a tremendous number of entirely new distractions such as smartphones, laptops, computers with instant access to the Internet. In other words, conveniences that should entertain them with a wide choice of options are actually giving rise to distraction disturbing them from their free time. What I mean by this, despite the obvious advantages of the good of humanity such as leisure in one device, people get stuck in front of black screen scrolling the Internet. Thus, a new addiction appeared. This is not only negatively affecting their life as the others addictions but also may deteriorate generations health (poor eyesight, back pain, sickliness due to lack of workout).
In conclusion, although previous generations predicted that by the 21st century their offspring would have more spare time, however, it never happened. The present life is increasingly packed with technological innovations and instead of enjoying their free time people forced to perform on a par with tireless machines with new bad habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-22 | Rehana Diwan | 48 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | ankita.hpgdc | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | bgoswamii | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | Ronald88 | 56 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | HelenPr | 89 | view |
- Write a letter to the Tour Company manager to appreciate your tour guide 1 Give your tour details 2 What do you like about the tour guide 3 Suggest ways for the manager to appreciate the guide 87
- After finishing school some students go travelling or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university Do you think the advantages of gap years outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Today single use products are still very common What are the problems associated with this What are some possible solutions 89
- Some people say it is a waste of time when plan for future It is more important to focus on present To what extent do you agree or disagree 91
- Leaders of any kind are younger today than in the past What are the reasons for that Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...k. Moreover, in the present appear to was been created a tremendous number of entirely...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10863509749 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88689603715 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593314763231 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8125777381 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6428571429 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 7.06120827912 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197134358324 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672766119409 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738190854497 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130958868299 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0441145054308 0.056905535591 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.