Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Friendship has been more and more valued and many standards to adjust friends have been proposed. Nowadays a new discussion over whether few friends over long time can make people happier or many friends made easily can has been triggered. In my opinion, small number of friends that people spend long time with are more valuable because they know each other well and time spent to sustain their relationship will not be much.
Some claim that more friends mean more happiness, and people can share their emotions with more people to get more comfort. However, uncertainty exists in this statement. People cannot guarantee every friend they made with short time could get along with them, they might have grown up from opposite backgrounds and have totally different opinions towards many things. That is why I insist that only long period can testify friendships.
Firstly, people can feel understood by friends over long time because they totally know each other, which can please people. With long time spent together, people realize each other, they know their hobbies and what they could be worried about. People can say anything they like to their friends, and they can always receive active responds. For instance, I have been having few friends since senior high school, we have known each other for more than ten years. During those years, every time I felt upset, I would turn to them for comfort. What impressed me the most was when I met them after the failure of my final exam. After the first glance of my face, they told me to forget about it and focus on the future. I asked them if they know what bothered me, and they said they could read my thoughts through my expressions. They gave me confidence to go through difficulties and let me know that I was understood under whatever situation.
Moreover, few friends mean less time needed to sustain friendship. People who have many friends can be easily tired when they have to spend the whole weekends socializing with many friends they are not familiar with. For instance, my roommate has so many friends that he could barely remember all their names. Every weekend, he got up earlier than other week days and go out to meet with others. They usually went to bars to have conversations over some topics that had nothing to do with his daily life. Their activity lasted for the whole day until midnight, he came back more tired than going to work. He has complained about it for many times. He realized what he kept doing were all useless socializing.
In conclusion, few friends over long time can make people happier because people understand each other and can say almost everything to them to have comfort, and people do not need to spend too much time on sustaining with them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-03 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 76 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | MichelleGAOOO | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-14 | HSNDEK | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-24 | AT2G38040 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree Most people think that some important problems can be solved by themselves or by thier families and thus it is almost not necessary to refer to the government 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed in study or job the ability to ajust or adapt to changing conduction or circumstance is more important than having excellent knowledge 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily Use specific reasons and ex 70
- Some people think governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and diseases To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Modern agriculture methods damage the environment but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...happier or many friends made easily can has been triggered. In my opinion, small nu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 43.0788530466 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2286.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 476.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8025210084 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26576969449 2.67179642975 85% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502100840336 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2215151256 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.44 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.04 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64 5.45110844103 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268694119767 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854797784138 0.076458572812 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630577295572 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196141693299 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650699674998 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.