Not all people follow the law on public roads.
What's the reason?
What are the best ideas for that?
Traffic and pedestrain regulations that are imposed by the governments are solely for the safety of the massess; however, of late, there has been an alarming increase in the flouting of laws by citizens. Some of the vital reasons behind this trend are improper policing by the authorities and people lacking safety awareness. Effective measures such as penalizing offenders and government apprising people about the importance of being safe while riding or walking could curb this pressing problem.
To begin with, people, in recent times, have become reluctant to abide by the safety laws that are imposed by the government owing to the absence of police and traffic authorities on most occasions. Moreover, the absense of CCTV cameras in most cities of countries such as India futher aids this trend of people flouting regulations even during broad daylight. Furthermore, a prodigious amount of the population, especially in countries such as India, are not aware of the safety rules that are defined by the nation. Obtaining license, for instance, in India, hardly requires an individual to fill in an application form and sequentially bribe the respective officer to obtain a driver's license.
Some of the remedial measures include firstly by identifying individuals who disobey the rules while riding a vehile or those who spit on the road with the aid of CCTV cameras and eventually imposing a huge penalty on the respective offender. This way, even habitual offenders would be devoid of breaking laws. Secondly, applicants who apply for a license should be compulsorily allowed to write exams in relation to obeying traffic rules. In Scotland, for instance, schools and colleges, in their curriculum, include some of the best practices such as refraining from throwing garbage or spit on road and effectively obeying the pedestrian rules. This is one reason why Scotland hardly witnessed even a minor accident or during the last decade and even before as well.
All in all, although people violate safety rules on roads by taking advantage of the absence of authorities and improper knowledge of the traffic and pedestrian laws, remedial measures such as observing violators by using CCTV security cameras and penalizing them could lessen traffic and pedestrain violation. Also, making people and the next generation conscious about the traffic rules in place and its importance can make people completely responsible and thereby making people obey laws effectively.
- Do the advantages of having English as a global language outweigh the disadvantage 73
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of leaving your country to live or study abroad 11
- Your children go to a local school that requires volunteers to accompany school science trips Write a letter to the school to apply to be a volunteer In the letter Introduce yourself and give details of your children who attend the school Explain why you 11
- Is it good for children to start using computers from an early age and spend long hours on them Discuss the advantages and disadvantages 81
- Not all people follow the law on public roads What s the reason What are the best ideas for that 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...se in the flouting of laws by citizens. Some of the vital reasons behind this trend are imp...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
...officer to obtain a drivers license. Some of the remedial measures include firstly by id...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 5.05154639175 396% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 32.9175257732 36% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 26.3917525773 224% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 13.0 3.85567010309 337% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2090.0 937.175257732 223% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 393.0 206.0 191% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31806615776 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 3.78020617076 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77232272604 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 127.690721649 163% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529262086514 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 670.5 290.88556701 231% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.41237113402 120% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1036025884 44.8134815571 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.285714286 76.5299724578 195% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 16.8248392259 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 4.34317383033 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.49484536082 268% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145256117876 0.216113520407 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468614656262 0.0766984524023 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334145885404 0.0603063233224 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0895401366618 0.12726935374 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323586732361 0.0580467560999 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 8.37731958763 211% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 70.7449484536 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 7.45979381443 206% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 8.71597938144 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 7.59969072165 128% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 41.2886597938 283% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.