The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps shows a detailed descriptions of the area around City Hospital for years 2007 and 2010 respectively, with some distiniction in both of them.

In 2007, the premises of city hospital was surrounded by a ring road. The hospital road, which connects the ring road with the city road, has three bus stops on the either side of it. Also, there was a single car parking area for the hospital, which was accessible only through ring road.

By 2010, there were some sizable additions around the area. The hospital premise has a new public car parking space on the right of the hospital, with the previous parking space now exclusive to the staff of the hospital. There is a new bus station built on the left side of the hospital road, which is accesible by the couple of new roundabouts, built on the either end of the road.

There was a minor omission in the area, with the removal of bus stops present on the either side of the hospital road by 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-06-19 Giang Tran 67 view
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 73 view
2024-03-28 Ahmad_off 78 view
Essays by user anirudh8860 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'description'?
Suggestion: description
The two maps shows a detailed descriptions of the area around City Hospital for ye...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37045763256 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468571428571 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2315390496 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 5.23603664747 19% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211152788757 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108514438815 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674916541299 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143482504543 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567914008719 0.0819641961636 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.