Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Finding soft tissue of the bones of a 70 million-year-old T-Rex was an exciting accomplishment for scientists. However, it may not be as it shows. Both the lecture and reading talk about this finding. The lecturer is not so sure about the validity of the tissue found in the T-Rex’s bone, while the reading is claiming that this tissue is a promising discovery.
The first issue we encounter is the accuracy of the claim concerning the channels found within the T-Rex’s bones. The professor is quick to point out that these alleged blood vessels may actually be the remnants of bacteria. According to the man bacteria tends to colonize these sorts of areas and what seems to be blood vessels may actually be the organic trace of the bacteria. However, the text is a bit more optimistic, it claims that these channel-like features are evidence of a soft substance that may represent the blood vessels of this ancient animal.
Furthermore, the discussion transitions into the presence of a sphere that could represent blood cells. Once more, the speaker dismisses this hypothesis. He states that other identical structures have been found in animals that did have blood cells, he points to the idea that these spheres may be of mineral origin and therefore could not be blood cells. In contrast, the passage alleges that the microscopic spheres found within the bone showed the presence of iron. Iron is essential in the formation of blood cells and thus this could be the smoking gun that points to this discovery as an indication of the presence of blood cells.
Last but not least, the final point of discord revolves around the trace of Collagen found in the T-Rex’s remains. A final word of contrast is offered by the instructor. Quite simply the man says that the oldest remains of Collagen found is around 100,000 years old, in the man’s eyes there is no way that Collagen could last 70 million years as it is the case in the sample of the T-Rex’s bones. Nevertheless, the article is convinced that the fibrous protein found in the T-Rex’s bone is the type of biochemical material expected to be found in association with Collagen.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2023-04-16 | rsheth05 | 80 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | prakriti malla | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | GRACE_047 | 73 | view |
- golden frog 78
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 71
- QUALITIES OF A GOOD NEIGHBOR 70
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Question Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer One of the attributes for the development of a strong 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hannels found within the T-Rex’s bones. The professor is quick to point out that th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 10.4613686534 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 30.3222958057 162% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 368.0 270.72406181 136% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86956521739 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65986389599 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483695652174 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3029404726 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.411764706 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6470588235 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1141854095 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405483548936 0.0996497079465 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038661536594 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0690793666618 0.162205337803 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022975909257 0.0443174109184 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 63.6247240618 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.