The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentages

Essay topics:

The table details the international tourist arrivals in millions in 8 countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes (in percentages).

The given table details the information on the proportional change with regard to the number of foreign tourists(in millions) who arrived in eight different countries in two distinct years 2009 and 2010.

Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that Germany, China, and Turkey witnessed a significant rise in the visitors' arrival trend over time. However, although almost all the other countries observed a slight uptick in the pattern, With a steep downfall Hongkong fell at the lowest rank.

According to the given illustration, despite low figures(10million, 22million, and 32 million) during the starting year, Germany, China, and Turkey led the entire chart in the context of the overall percentage change leading to 109%, 55%, and 33% with the passing time. Many other countries including the USA, Spain, UK, and Italy reported an upward trend at a steady pace with 1.5%, 1.8%, 3.6%, and 2.3% respectively, compared to 66million, 55million,55 million, and 44million as per 2009 report.

On the contrary, whilst France noticed a similar figure of 76million each year, with a downfall, Hongkong plunged below the lowest value before dipping down to only -11 on the percentage scale.

Votes
Average: 8 (9 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-10-06 phg_phg 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...key witnessed a significant rise in the visitors arrival trend over time. However, altho...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, on the contrary, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39267015707 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79412463572 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670157068063 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2757853913 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.666666667 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244658989641 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109523538255 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114616142914 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145534509582 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129018101664 0.0819641961636 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'visitors'' or 'visitor's'?
Suggestion: visitors'; visitor's
...key witnessed a significant rise in the visitors arrival trend over time. However, altho...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, on the contrary, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1030.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39267015707 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79412463572 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670157068063 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.482926829268 1449% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2757853913 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 171.666666667 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.23603664747 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244658989641 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109523538255 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114616142914 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145534509582 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129018101664 0.0819641961636 157% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 13.2329268293 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.22 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.