Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poorer countries rather than financial aid.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
To help erase the poverty line in many developing countries, developed countries usually donate money as a main form of assistance. However, this approach is not always effective in practice, and some suggest that affluent countries should provide support in other forms than money. Personally, I completely agree with the ineffectiveness of financial aid, for there are a high probability of being misused and a number of more constructive types of foreign aid available.
To start with, it is of the high chance that leading bodies in the recipient countries will use the money package on strayed purposes. Wrongful leaders can consume money for their own good by investing in their personal fortunes. In other cases, in order to superficially drive economic growth, some governments might neglect the poverty-stricken population and steer the fund into more profitable businesses. For example, the Brazilian government invested a hefty sum of money into building the facilities needed to host the World Cup 2014; even if the involved financial and manpower resources were capable of lifting the living conditions of half of its slum areas.
As well as that, some third world nations have yet to have the adequate resources and technical know-how in eradicating the roots of poverty, including but not limited to: poor education, conflict, and the outdated healthcare system. As a case in point, a majority of children in Africa have suffered from malaria, a notorious disease that causes high fevers and sometimes death. Meanwhile, the rest of the world has already had malaria vaccination since the start of the 21st century, yet few places in Africa have the access to this type of disease prevention. Medical aid in this scenario is more proper to raise the livelihoods of millions of destitute people than does a financial aid. Therefore, wealthy nations should consider other means of help such as medical aid, military aid, and voluntary aid, depending on the urgent situations in the underdeveloped and developing nations.
To sum up, I believe that donating money to poor countries is not the optimal strategy to cut world poverty, since the donation can be misused and is too peripheral to solve the roots of the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Thai Tran | 87 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-31 | thaokim2003 | 89 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poorer countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, third, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, to start with, to sum up, as well as that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18457300275 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84845021319 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592286501377 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.142319589 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.769230769 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9230769231 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232140733552 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783183045442 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652669655385 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140707689416 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794756094762 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.