Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
One of the main reasons that people work is to secure their futures. Was it easier for past generations to choose a prosperous career? In my opinion, in the past, predicting a successful business was quite easier than today.
The first reason why I believe that it was easier to plan a successful job in the past than today is lack of competition. Companies in the past did not have to put a great effort in their products since there were no tough competitors. For example, five decades ago, if a woman needed a purse, she would simply visit the only store in town and buy whatever the store offers. The fact that there were no other shops to compete with the bags shop, made it easier for the business to be profitable. In contrast, nowadays, it is not easy to be successful because there are numerous numbers of shops that selling the same products. As a result, shops must do their best to gain customers in order to beat other competitors.
Secondly, in our grandparent’s generation, people had the most basic life and, they did not have much. Accordingly, businessmen were easily able to spot what are individuals missing and provide them with it. For example, my grandfather once told me that when he was eighteen years old, a new phone store had been opened in their town. The owner of the store knew that his business would be a hit since people at that time were not developed enough and knew little about phones. At first people in his town were not sure whether it was a wise idea to buy them or not. However, after a while, majority of residents including my grandfather purchased a phone. It was easy for the owner to gain a lot of profits because he provided people with something completely new to them.
These examples demonstrate that it was easier in the past to plan for a prosperous job. Not only because there was no competition at that time, but also, people were simple.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | Zmx_6 | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | waliwaliwa | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Why do you think some people are attracted to dangerous sports or other dangerous activities Use specific reasons and examples 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat time, but also, people were simple.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in contrast, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59064327485 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55524105817 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529239766082 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 618.680645161 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1999888778 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.2222222222 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94444444444 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173724952513 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061800964196 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603196648986 0.0737576698707 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131545112658 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542309077688 0.0645574589148 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.