The chart below shows the price in Euros of 800 grams of four types of bread in one European country from 2001 to 2006
The provided data enumerates** the cost of 800 grams of four types of bread (Wholegrain, Brown, White, Rye), calculated in Euros, in the European nation between 2001 and 2006. **As is observed,** both Brown and Whitebread increasingly became more expensive, whereas the changes in the prices of Rye and Wholegrain were marginal.
As far as the details are concerned,** Brown and Whitebread initially cost 0.6 Euro per 800g in 2001. Over 4 years, the figure gradually grew to roughly 1.6 and 1.3 in 2005 respectively, although there was a slight decrease of 0.2 Euros in the price of Brown bread in the 2003-2004 period.
It is also conspicuous that** the value of Wholegrain bread soared significantly to 1.8 as compared to where it initially started - 0.8. Despite this fact, the figure experienced a consistent reduction and finally ended up right at exactly the price it had been 4 years ago - 0.8. As for Rye bread, 800g cost 0.6 Euros in 2001 and there was a slight increase which made it cost 0.7 Euros in 2005.
- Some people think that the only way to have success in business is to have a unique product. What factors do you think influence the success of a company? 89
- Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of a bad person’s nature. Discuss both these views and give your opinion? 84
- Online shopping is becoming more popular How could this trend affect our environment and the kinds of work required 89
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 191, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , *
... between 2001 and 2006. **As is observed,** both Brown and Whitebread increasingly...
^^
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , *
.... As far as the details are concerned,** Brown and Whitebread initially cost 0....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, so, whereas, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82857142857 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76068346042 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.393096412 43.030603864 236% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.0 112.824112599 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.0 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233922627392 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124721819935 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879286759524 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154931763402 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047197605105 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.