29.The maps provide the layout of South Wing of Whelton Museum in 2008 and 2012
The maps provide changes which took place in the layout of South Wing of Whelton Museum in two different years,2008 and 2012.
Overall, it is clear that the Whelton Museum became a more developing destination with more modern facilities and services.
One of the most striking alterations was the transformation of an entrance into an entrance room above the stairs in 2012. Moreover, there used to be a cloak house on the far left corner of the layout. However, it was 2012 that the cloakroom was moved to the gallery area.
According to the maps, the upper stairs next to the interactive gallery was upgraded into a more convenient lift which can be used by more visitors. Four years later from 2008, great changes had occurred with the number of rooms was almost double. In addition, the introduction of not only an exhibition room but also a cafeteria and a children playground in the left side of the layout was one of the most remarkable changes of the Museum in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-18 | quynhnhi280103 | 78 | view |
- In many countries people are spending more hours at their workplace Why is that Is that a negative and positive development 89
- Some parents give their children everything that their children ask for and accept what their children want to do Is this good for children What could be the consequences for these children 89
- In some culture old people are valued more while in other cultures youth is considered more valuable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- 5 The graph shows the development of a particular college capus from 1975 to 2002 and the proposed development of 2020 44
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger Other say that economic growth is causing damage to the environment and should be stopped now Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74269005848 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6168006094 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6781592116 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271806209682 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121305235595 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172352925836 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206632913253 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.209031598466 0.0819641961636 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.