The two plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the park today.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, make comparison where relevant.
The two plans show some changes that were made for the park and how it looks today. Overall, as can be seen from the plans, the basic layout of the park has been modified and new design elements have been added.
First of all, having looked at the two pictures, the most striking modification that took place is demolition of the fountain which was located in the middle of the area. Whereas, nowadays, the rose garden with seats on the sides has been built. In addition to this, the stage for musicians has been turned into the amphitheater for concerts and due to this change it was necessary to remove seats at the left side of the park as well as the rose gardens. The entrances at the both sides of the park have been unchanged but there was addition of another entrance which is located near the car park. Speaking about the top right side of the park, the cafe and the children’s play area have replaced the pond for water plants. Instead of the pond for water plants, the water feature, occupying the bottom right part, has been built.
- Some educationalists argue that non exam art based subjects such as music drama art and craft shoud be compulsory in the secondary school curriculum They believe that activities such as these can improve overall academic performance To what extent do you 84
- The diagram below shows the Petersburg Art Museum before and after renovations Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- Recycling is now an essential measure it is time for everyone in society to become more responsible towards the environment To what extent do you agree of disagree with this statement 84
- The map below shows the present and proposed facilities of a university and the pie charts compare the percentages of engineering and medical students 72
- Some people believe that libraries should be funded while others think that they are useless as we have the Internet Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, well, whereas, in addition, speaking about, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 858.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.49214659686 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15813525169 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575916230366 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.790960446 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 5.23603664747 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128218065083 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642155301538 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658583717975 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124358025264 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434529944838 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.06 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.