Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer
nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the
responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their
citizens themselves?
You should write at least 250 words.
In the era of globalization, when developed nations are self-sufficient to fulfill the needs of their own people, the courtesy and ethical values demand a sense of healthy favor being provided to those who are less fortunate in managing even basic amenities. It is often said that prosperity spreads with united actions. Although a section of society considers governments of the poor nations to be accountable for their conditions, I stand in favor of the former statement and think that irrespective of any differences the wealthy nations should offer a hand of help for the betterment of the world as a whole.
It is normally seen that rich countries are well equipped with the required ammunition in the context of the high-tech health care system, standardized educational resources, and sufficient funds. In such a scenario, their timely help can contribute to a colossal difference in their development path. However, on the flip side, this assistance can be misused in the wrong ways. For example, some under-developed countries use these crucial funds to disturb their competitive countries instead of using it in favor of their peoples' needs. Hence, a factor of caution is needed while offering such assistance.
On the other hand, ignoring the poor nations just due to certain factors is not advisable. As if wealthy nations will not come ahead then the disturbing groups can mislead the young generation into various criminal activities, which can result in chaos in the entire world. For instance, many international criminals are a result of a lack of educational and basic facilities. Moreover, who knows if the world can find another researcher or a scientist hidden among such nations.
To conclude, the views on whether poor nations should be assisted by the wealthy ones vary to a greater extent. However, in my opinion, an intelligent approach can play a pivotal role in the progressive path of a healthy nation worldwide.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-10 | Dhvani Bhanushali | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows how solar panels can be used to provide electricity for domestic use 84
- 82
- Tourism is encouraged in many countries Does tourism bring more advantages or disadvantages to a country 92
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 73
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...den among such nations. To conclude, the views on whether poor nations should...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... greater extent. However, in my opinion, an intelligent approach can play a pivot...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h of a healthy nation worldwide.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, well, while, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 965.302439024 170% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.424390244 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18296529968 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9610749151 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 106.607317073 181% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608832807571 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 283.868780488 178% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1756435052 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 5.23603664747 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258841428774 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765071409787 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059381741162 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150998909566 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440792046108 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 40.7170731707 243% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.4329268293 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.