the graph below shows the changes in the places where people used to surf the Internet in the years 1998,2002 and 2004.
The diagram provides information on changes of surfing internet in four different years and places.
Overall, in this chart we can see that home dominated than other places. An interesting fact is that, work, college and libraries percentage of using internet did not climb 30%. The usage of internet at work was becoming lower year after year.
Started at 1998 surfing the social nets at home illustrated around 55%, it is the same percentage with the last 2004 year. The same percentages belong to users of internet at work was 28% (1998-2000). We can see the similar rate between collage and work. In 1998, surfing on the internet at the library demonstrated very small number. In the second year, home moderately dropped, but the rate of work and college remained equal percentage with the previous year. But library modestly escalated and reached around 18%.
The next year is 2002, home exhibited almost the similar number with antecedent year. Surfing the social nets at work slowly went down and presented nearly the equal percentage with college. The next identical number belong to the usage of internet at library, in the second two years. In 2004,home moderately rose and returned to percentage which were presented in 1998.But work sharply decreased and exhibited approximately 15%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-26 | EnglishUSA_uz | 73 | view |
- The chart below gives informatin the resul of a british survey on the types of houses people liked taken in 2005 73
- This graph tries to introduce Great Britain s railway journeys from 1950 to 2004 05
- This chart tries to introduce different places where the internet is surfing by humanity during five years 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they ratedthe hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010
- It must be admitted that in many countries around the world there What are the causes of the problem and give possible solutins 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 371, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...percentage which were presented in 1998.But work sharply decreased and exhibited ap...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12735849057 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55809588847 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 329.4 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4066511411 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6428571429 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.35714285714 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214679692955 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831204278809 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0619326580227 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153999649746 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337623551537 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.88 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.