The information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that mass communications might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the information revolution can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the importance of the information revolution can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of people and knowledge are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the positive effects of mass communications. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both online materials and the advent of the Internet distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of technology, without the slightest doubt, the effects of the information revolution might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the elimination of traditional rituals. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the virtual world can relate to the reality that the demerits of social networks can pertain to the computer networks. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of mass media were correlated positively with new ways of communications, the local authorities would ultimately address public relationships. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of the information technology.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of the information revolution far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-29 | Basil3241 | 72 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-06-27 | Janabakhshi | 90 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | richierich25 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | shivek | 100 | view |
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or curse 88
- Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to Climate change education or public health Explain your idea with examples 85
- You are given climate as the field of study Which area would you prefer Explain why you picked this up the particular area of your study 88
- the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Prevention is better than cure Out of a country s health budget a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1207.87684729 141% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84192439863 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44342586071 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.6335180957 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.545454545 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4545454545 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301832437768 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947426901709 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114806370768 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158758831409 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112220482833 0.0609392437508 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.3 12.6369458128 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 53.1260098522 37% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 10.9458128079 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.89 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.