Some people say that the Government should break down all the historic buildings and replace them with modern buildings. Do you agree or disagree?
Ancient and Historical buildings are the root and precious heritage of the country. Some people believe that Historical architecture should be replaced with modern buildings as people update themselves day by day hence, the Government should do the same by breaking ancient buildings and move forward to modernism. I affirmatively disagree with this notion, People should cherish and protect the historical places. This essay will analyze the important factors of historical building and will disaccord with the given statement.
To Commence, Historical buildings represent the culture and moral values of the country. Most people worship in those buildings and by demolishing the building, people might get hurt as there will not be a place to worship. On top of that, a historical monument has a colonial structure that is hard to witness these days. Therefore, it is converted into local attractions and tourism. Countless tourists come to visit these places which helps the local inhabitants to generate the source of income and it can become one of the pioneers for the Economy. For example, the Taj Mahal is a vital structure in Indian history. It is also one of the seven wonders in the world and because of this reason, Every year a number of tourists are accelerating to witness the beauty of this monument.
Needless to say, Ancient monuments are considered to be a symbol of pride. Instead of razing them, the Government should make efforts to prevent and restore them. Albeit, Due to the housing problem it is essential to build modern buildings, however, that can be achieved without compromising Historical treasure. To exemplify, In India, many substantial buildings were demolished to create modern buildings, however, the housing problem still remained unresolved. Hence, the government should adopt an alternative approach to create new constructions than just tearing down historic monuments.
In Conclusion, I believe Historical Buildings are the possible way to time travel in ancient history as they represent the cultural values and the history of our ancestors. Therefore, the Government should not break down the Historical buildings and should restore its glory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-09 | krishyparms | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | coolchris2100 | 90 | view |
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle But some people suggest that recycling is not enough They believe we need to consume less 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 73
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s hard to witness these days. Therefore, it is converted into local attractions a...
^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ising Historical treasure. To exemplify, In India, many substantial buildings wer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3768115942 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85646842942 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539130434783 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5714256802 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.055555556 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.433671106065 0.244688304435 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11930086719 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112198636117 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256345825086 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124419972771 0.056905535591 219% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.