The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
These graphs show trends in both global population throughout a period of 600 years (between 1400 and 2000) and region population distribution in the end of 20th century and in the beginning of 21st.
Looking overall the line graph, we can note moderate growth of world population from less than 500 million in 1400 to above 1 billion in 1700. During the reminder of the period, the increase was sharper, and only between 1700 and 1800 there was obvious decline which reached the point of 0.9 billion people. In the beginning of 21st century the population size was equal to 6 billion.
The pie charts show that in both 1900 and 2000 the majority of population lived in Asia, followed by Europe. As can be seen from the charts, there was a decline in percentage distribution in Asia as well as Europe from 60% to 54% and from 24% to 14% respectively. The North America kept a balance in 5 % of world population, when in Africa and Latin America we could see a significant growth accounted almost over 3 times of values in the end of 20th century (in Africa it became 13% and in Latin America 8%).
The percentage in other areas rose from 3,5% to 6%. In conclusion, most considerable changes in percentage population was in both Europe and Africa continents.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-13 | Hayoni Candy | 82 | view |
| 2023-06-13 | Hayoni Candy | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000 and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The line graph shows the number of immigrants who obtained UK citizenship between 1962 and 2002 and the bar chart gives a breakdown of the number in 1996 and 2002 according to the continents they came from Summarize the information by selecting and report 11
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main 89
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in 2000 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63228699552 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62064979065 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556053811659 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4977875673 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.777777778 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250126627722 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107671867209 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106723006495 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15272373138 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087935301918 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.