Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
The great wave of economic globalization has opened up a new horizon of opportunity for human capital. Hence, the question arises as to whether eminent employees from undeveloped countries should be accepted to go for a job in developed nations. From my perspective, I firmly agree with this statement since this will bring beneficial impacts on both the rich nations and the employees as well
To begin with, there is a variety of justifications to support this opinion. In term of the economy, one fundamental explanation is that it will make a great contribution to boosting the productivity of rich countries. It does not seem unreasonable to claim that labours equipped with expertise and in-depth knowledge always play a pivotal role in enhancing the economic development of any nation, thereby allowing them for an occupation will spectacularly advantageous to these developed countries. By the way of exemplifying, workers from South East Asia as well as other section of this continent are attributing significantly to the GDP of several Western countries and the United State of America can be a suitable case in point
On the other hand, regarding labourer from underdeveloped countries, the international labour market may offer them a life-changing opportunity. There seems to be evidence that working in developed nations, where their professionalism and infrastructure is unparalleled, is synonymous with employees will have more chance to apply the knowledge and skills they accomplished at the academic institutions into practice. Furthermore, the salary at international businesses will be irrefutably far higher when compared to that of domestic counterparts. Consequently, employees in rich countries are allegedly no longer struggle with insufficient finance or monetary difficulty
In conclusion, I completely support the idea that developed countries should permit jobs for skilled and well-educated labours from developing counterparts since it can boost their economy. Additionally, this elevates the income of employees and gave them a chance to apply their in-depth knowledge into practice.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | hieu13092006 | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-04 | quytnee | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-11 | Sayansh Garg | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Mohsensnake | 56 | view |
- Some people think that the range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor Others think it has an opposite effect Discuss both views and give opinions 78
- Today, more school leavers are unable to find jobs. Discuss the causes of risingunemployment among young adults and suggest any solutions. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...an capital. Hence, the question arises as to whether eminent employees from undeveloped coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ufficient finance or monetary difficulty In conclusion, I completely support the ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, well, as to, in conclusion, as well as, by the way, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6261682243 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3820672521 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.042653156 49.4020404114 186% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.6 106.682146367 169% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7 7.06120827912 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252289206643 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938561118414 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838128061805 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166155306846 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0578671166848 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.08 50.2224549098 44% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 7.44779559118 213% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 11.3001002004 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.97 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.