The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph describes information about how much oil have been produced and consumed in China during a period of 24 years.
As it can be seeing from the chart, both indexes starts from 2 millions of oil barrels per day in 1982. On the one hand, consumption line stagnates on the level of 2 millions till the 1990. On the other hand, production level soars between 1982 and 1986 and gets 3 millions barrels per day, and saves this level till 1990.
Production level between 1990 and 2006 slowly climbs to the level of 3.5~ millions barrels without deviations. According to the chart, consumption level raises sharply from 1990, and crosses production level between 1990 and 1994, then rapidly grows till the end of chart in 2006 on the level of more than 6 millions barrels per day.
To sum up, in the beginning of 1980’s production level grows faster, comparing to consumption, but stops on the level of 3 millions. In the same time, consumption level stars growing only in 1990’s, but grows very sharply and saves this tendency till the end of chart.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | view | |
| 2022-06-26 | Kiwi | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-10 | Hamza khan1 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-22 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 73
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 56
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...rom the chart, both indexes starts from 2 millions of oil barrels per day in 1982. On the one...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 188, Rule ID: IN_1990s[2]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990’s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990’s
...e, consumption level stars growing only in 1990’s, but grows very sharply and saves this ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, then, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 879.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72580645161 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4321822431 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537634408602 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2310001831 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.875 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131280461456 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707519365108 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300644078179 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885483242596 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03190683806 0.0819641961636 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.