Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money.
Nowadays, the number of people who think that developing the technology for space exploration it is just a waste of money and time is significantly larger than it used to be. Other part of people do not agree with this statement. To my way of thinking, there are much more reasons why people decide to waste less money for the exploration of space than people who think that is the best way to develop our world. This essay will show the reasons of this point of view.
Firstly, we can notice that scientists have been looking for water on Mars for last thousand years and nothing has happened since that time. Any of these researches did not achieve success. Secondly, the need of humanity should always come first. While people on Earth need help, a lot of money on sending spacecraft or robots onto other planet is spent. In addition, there is a huge number of environmental problems in our century and this number is growing each day. The last reason of spending less on space exploration is that we know so little about our own planet, while we waste financial resources to find out more about other planets and the Space.
Nevertheless, we cannot deny that space exploration gives us large opportunities in the future such as to live on other planets or cheap travel by spacecraft. Moreover, due to the work of satellites in space the correct weather forecast on Earth is possible.
In conclusion, I can say that although we depend on space technologies such as satellites, we should limit money and time for developing space exploration and do not forget about our planet and environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-06 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Zeroplague0407 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | Vivi_peach | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | hyentie | 89 | view |
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 75
- Children can learn more efficiently by watching television Children should watch television regularly both in school and at home Do you agree or disagree 61
- The charts below provide information on popular modes of transport in the city of Cambridge for the years 2008 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 87
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals during festival periods people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think the money spent in developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnologies such as satellites, we should limit money and time for developing spac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73835125448 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63113687556 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9706753454 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373057289954 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116333417155 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112718265847 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218653657877 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132505173403 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chnologies such as satellites, we should limit money and time for developing spac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1322.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73835125448 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63113687556 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551971326165 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9706753454 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.692307692 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.373057289954 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116333417155 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112718265847 0.0667982634062 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218653657877 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132505173403 0.056905535591 233% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.