Task 2: In countries where there is high unemployment, most pupils should be offered only primary education. There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent years, the debate on the necessity of education in the context of soaring unemployment rate has never been completely settled. Although pursuing post-primary education without future job prospects may appear nonsensical, middle school abolition cannot be viewed as the optimal approach for humankind to tackle this situation due to its counterproductiveness and immorality.
First, not facilitating secondary education is counteracting because it may exacerbate the problem of unemployment. In fact, one of the major causes of unemployment is the implementation of automation technology; therefore, limiting the youth to elementary-level education is an act of surrender to the robots and the issue itself. Instead, children should be encouraged to harness transferable skills in order to not be displaced by these tools. By this approach, societies experiencing high rates of joblessness are less likely to witness their workmanship quality be compromised, which is the inevitable and undesirable outcome of the suggested abolition.
Second, restricting post-primary education is an unethical violation of the human right to education. Consequently, this scourge aggravates social inequality across the world, jeopardizing the youth’s life chances. For example, because of their illiteracy, a great number of Indian children are deprived of the opportunity to participate in the professional environment, unlike other competent candidates from educationally developed countries such as the U.S.. Furthermore, the mentioned abolition underestimates the core purpose of education. Not only does the privilege of studying secure a decent job, it also promotes self-esteem and personal growth, which is equally worthy of appreciation and should not be considered redundant.
In conclusion, taking the unwanted after effect and human injustice into consideration, it is groundless to overlook the paramount importance of post-primary education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | doquytuan | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-28 | anann2712 | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-17 | nam.phanthanh97 | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-13 | Huy Do | 84 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 89
- The chart shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 73
- The chart below shows the annual pay thousands of US dollars for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004 89
- Task 2 In countries where there is high unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...ally developed countries such as the U.S.. Furthermore, the mentioned abolition un...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, may, second, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03597122302 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.56942574732 2.80592935109 127% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651079136691 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.0899575087 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.833333333 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168401982043 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0533789609234 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301467205387 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885501569857 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395035468855 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.05 12.4159519038 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.91 8.58950901804 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.