The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars?
With the advancement in the transportation field, cars have been used on a larger scale than it was before. Despite of being accessible, the mass usage of cars has created many side-effects that need to be identified so as to find a better approach to solve the issue.
There are three major problems associated with the frequent operation of automobile of which the public could clearly aware. Firstly, since the conveyance discharged exhaust into the environment, the dramatic use of cars means that more emission will be exposed to the ecosystem. These are the main reasons caused air pollution, or in the worst scenario, causing greenhouse effect. Secondly, due to the efficient of automobile, more and more people refused to take other transports. The increasing in the number of vehicles on the street results in the traffic jam in the rush hours. Finally, sometimes, driving is not the safe way to travel. According to a report, 80% casualties every year is the consequence of car accidents.
From the problems above, some proposed a resolution is to impose restriction on cars’ operation. However, there is a less severe approach. If the manufacture could produce an environmentally friendly product, which applying solar power or hydrogen, it is then not necessary to worried about the exhaust from such a vehicle. Furthermore, if drivers are educated properly before licensing, safety will be the prioritize.
In conclusion, I deem that there are three primary disadvantages of cars overuse, and discouraging cars may not be a permanent cure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-06 | junii | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | junii | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | claraa_ltn | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-04 | gagandeep@13 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-01 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 89
- The line graph shows the size of the global population from 1400 to 2000, and the pie charts show the global population by region in 1900 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems What are those problems In order to reduce the problems should we discourage people to use cars 61
- The map below show a book store in 2000 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...side-effects that need to be identified so as to find a better approach to solve the iss...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...operly before licensing, safety will be the prioritize. In conclusion, I deem that there are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1306.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18253968254 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01428529635 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1980359367 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2857142857 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23673972534 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621517129397 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603467061773 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132045260677 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347252877993 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.