Energy usage in the USA
The line graph illustrates the energy usage in the USA by six different fuel resources namely Petrol and Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Nuclear, Solar/Wind and Hydropower during the year 1980 to 2030, measured in quadrillion units.
Over the span of 50 years, the usage of the fuel in the USA as Petrol and Oil, Coal, Natural Gas, Nuclear, and Solar/Wind increased, while the quantity of fuel as Hydropower remained almost constant throughout.
Beginning with the usage of Petrol and Oil as fuel started with 35 quadrillion units in 1980, and decreased slightly to 31 quadrillion units in 1985. It came back to its starting point in 1990; however, there was a sharp rise year on year (35 quadrillion unit to 47 quadrillion unit), from 1995 to 2030. Talking about Coal (starting with 16 quadrillion units) and Natural Gas (starting with 20 quadrillion unit) both mostly showed upper trend ending their journey with coal at 30 quadrillion unit and natural gas at 25 quadrillion unit at the end of 2030.
The last three energy consumers Nuclear, Solar/Wind, and Hydropower started at 4 quadrillion unit in the year 1980. Nuclear made a slight increase, while Solar/Wind remained steady throughout the years, and hydropower made a slight decrease and remained at the bottom throughout the years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-20 | feya | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-02 | ahsan042 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | ashiqulalamkhan | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | marykim7178 | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | marykim7178 | 82 | view |
- Goods transported in UK 73
- In some parts of the world it is becoming popular to research the history of one s own family Why might people want to do this Is it a positive or negative development 56
- Some people believe money is a less important factor than free time for quality of life What other factors are necessary to live a good quality of lifestyle 61
- The chart below shows male and female fitness membership between 1970 and 2000 in some land 87
- Nowadays more and more older people compete with younger people for the same jobs What can be the reason for this What would you suggest as a solution 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 2030, measured in quadrillion units. Over the span of 50 years, the usage of ...
^^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned at the bottom throughout the years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03286384977 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72527831258 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7352890719 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.142857143 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4285714286 22.9334400587 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122434213436 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770901787782 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846849241417 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112749735744 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885521585128 0.0819641961636 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.49 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.