The idea that the only way to mitigate a load of traffic in a metropolis nowadays is by minimizing the number of citizens commuting from home to work, study, and entertainment. Although some people believe that this tendency is beneficial, I would argue that there are other measures which people can take to tackle this problem,
It is convenient for the young generation to work from home instead of traveling to the workplace. As modern technology is developing tremendously, people can complete their work at their own home before submitting to their supervisors through the help of the internet. Consequently, there will be fewer commuters to go to work on the stress at peak hours. Furthermore, there are countless shops and centers selling online, people just need to search and choose what they are passionate about, then there will have a delivery system to ship at your door. It is efficient and saves time for people who are always busy that cannot find free time to go shopping.
In contrast, I believe that there are more effective solutions to reduce traffic congestion in cities. The first thing is that the government could implement a law related to encourage inhabitants using the public means of transport such as buses, trains in order to decrease private vehicles moving on the stress. In addition, public transportation fares should be inexpensive; therefore all citizens could use them daily to travel to work or shopping. Secondly, authorities could create some applications on smartphones or computers for shopping as well as working online. As a result, people can take advantage of those programs to get access to their necessary things without going out. All they need to do is just order and there will be a shipper that will deliver to your doors at any time.
In conclusion, some people said that the only way to reduce vehicles is to let people work from home, it seems to me that there are several approaches that can be taken to address this issue.
The idea that the only way to mitigate a load of traffic in a metropolis nowadays is by minimizing the number of citizens commuting from home to work, study, and entertainment. Although some people believe that this tendency is beneficial, I would argue that there are other measures which people can take to tackle this problem,
It is convenient for the young generation to work from home instead of traveling to the workplace. As modern technology is developing tremendously, people can complete their work at their own home before submitting to their supervisors through the help of the internet. Consequently, there will be fewer commuters to go to work on the stress at peak hours. Furthermore, there are countless shops and centers selling online, people just need to search and choose what they are passionate about, then there will have a delivery system to ship at your door. It is efficient and saves time for people who are always busy that cannot find free time to go shopping.
In contrast, I believe that there are more effective solutions to reduce traffic congestion in cities. The first thing is that the government could implement a law related to encourage inhabitants using the public means of transport such as buses, trains in order to decrease private vehicles moving on the stress. In addition, public transportation fares should be inexpensive; therefore all citizens could use them daily to travel to work or shopping. Secondly, authorities could create some applications on smartphones or computers for shopping as well as working online. As a result, people can take advantage of those programs to get access to their necessary things without going out. All they need to do is just order and there will be a shipper that will deliver to your doors at any time.
In conclusion, some people said that the only way to reduce vehicles is to let people work from home, it seems to me that there are several approaches that can be taken to address this issue.
- The pie charts compare the water usage of various sectors of the economy in Sydney in two years 1997 and 2007 Overall it is clear that the sector which used the highest percentage of water was the food industry The percentage of total water use by the ser
- It is true that people who have a reference for reading rather than watching TV usually have more lively imaginations and sharped language skill While many people oppose to this idea I strongly agree with this view On the one hand I advocate that reading 67
- It is widely believed that national authority should raise the price of petrol to address environmental issues I strongly disagree with this idea because there are various other effective solutions It is unreasonable to raise taxes on petrol in order to m 61
- The idea that whether diligence and persistence or material wealth and physical appearance are more significant remains a source of controversy While all these are necessary I believe that key factors for success in life are hard working and determined On 61
- The table illustrates the amount of money which is allocated in the US EU and other nations used in support of technology by charities over the period from 2006 to 2010 Overall it is evident that most of the countries experienced an increase during the gi 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92857142857 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73325140909 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7634641767 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.384615385 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8461538462 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6923076923 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338749680607 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112727734522 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155948608241 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264682967728 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.238077170628 0.056905535591 418% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.