Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why?
Taking care of children is not an easy task for every parent, Here I believe if we keep them away from smart phones with internet access will be better for both and parents as well as children. So, I would like to disagree the given statement by putting my own opinion with examples that describe the scenario in the best way, and I have several reasons for these lets seen each of them.
Now a day’s children can catch up the things much faster than us, they have an ability to thing and grasp the things very quickly. So, at this stage if we give them the smart phone and any other device which having the internet connect connection might affect them in a hasty manner. Although they can learn lot many things from the internet using their smartphone but I believe that this is not the right time to introduce them to the social world. There are chances that they can get used to it and make that habit as a part of their life. Here we being as a parent should teach them the difference between the social and practical world.
That can make their life easy and helps them grow up in proper way. The other reason is, if we prevent them using the smartphone and other devices, they can have more time to spent with the family and friends. And also, we can encourage them go the play the outdoor game. By doing such they can stay fit and get active every day. These things can not happen if they use the smartphone, studies show that children who uses smart phones at early stage always prefer to stay alone and they are afraid to go in public, that is serious and being as parent we should take care of this.
One of my nice was very active and loved to play with the gadgets and the smartphones. And her parents were very impressed with her talent. But after certain time period she started acting in inappropriate manner like we keep smart phone with her at that time only she used to stay calm, otherwise her overall behavior was very unacceptable. Reason behind this she made thing as a part of her life and was get addicted. And now suffering from many things like headache, not having the proper visuals due to the blue light that smartphone emits. Considering the given scenarios, we can say that yes smart phone does have a bad effect on children. However, it can be use as important aspect in their life, but with some proper instruction and giving some time limit in it. Then only we can take the benefit of technology. Only the thing is we should know the uses of it.
Here I would like to conclude in the statement by given my personal experience in this. And I believe if we consider this over all scenario, we can surely say that smart phone can have band impacts on children if we being as parents allow them to use it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | Jasman23 | 40 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | memi00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anaju.candida | 76 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | anaju.candida | 76 | view |
| 2021-10-02 | kk_kk | 66 | view |
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 70
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones cell phones with Internet access while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch Which point of view do you think is better and why 73
- Under British and Australian laws a jury in a criminal case has no access to information about the defendant s past criminal record This protects the person who is being accused of the crime Some lawyers have suggested that this practice should be changed 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hasty manner" with adverb for "hasty"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...et connect connection might affect them in a hasty manner. Although they can learn lot many thing...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 76.0 43.0788530466 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2244.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.39138943249 4.8611393121 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.14019171368 2.67179642975 80% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455968688845 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.86738351254 375% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4082971682 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5652173913 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2173913043 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.17391304348 5.45110844103 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205060249463 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614151086282 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673250312255 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140296473646 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686507106451 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 10.9000537634 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 10.002688172 170% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.