Many people are travelling to other countries. Why is it the case? Is it a positive or negative development?
It is recognized that international tourism has been increasingly prevalent over the past few years. Two contributing factors stand out as responsible for this tendency, which is believed to exert a double-edged impact on the society.
To begin with, the trend towards paying a visit to foreign countries can be attributed to a number of reasons. Firstly, the desire of broadening up cultural horizons is inherent in our thoughts. Therefore, multinational tourism, which offers residents an excessive load of unprecedented experience, ranging from contemplating novel breathtaking views to mingling with primitive local communities, can obviously satisfy our thirst for discovery. In addition, it is the flourish in transportation and international integration that acts as a catalyst for the aforementioned tendency. Indeed, since mobility models have been ubiquitous and affordable, and harmony between nations are maintained and promoted, tourists may find it more favorable than ever to set foot on another country.
In my opinion, while the advantages of international travel are discernible, its drawbacks are also tangible. On the one hand, if local attractions are thronged with foreign visitors, which is accompanied by a massive influx of money, that will play a pivotal role in stimulating interests in conservation. Indeed, this reminds local residents that besides its cultural advantages, transmitting historical values is also in line with their inherent desires of prosperity, so local heritage protection can attract more involvement of community. However, on the other hand, international tourism is recognized as a contributing factor of cultural clashes, in which tourists violate local codes of conduct by getting drunk, littering or dressing inappropriately. Consequently, not only does this pose threats to security but also causes a loss of moral and religious values at the attractions.
Briefly, multinational travel, which is facilitated by a number of reasons, offer both pros and cons to regions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-20 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
- The government should spend more money on medical research to protect citizens health rather than on protecting the environment Do you agree or disagree 80
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 89
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a double-edged impact on the society. To begin with, the trend towards paying ...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... religious values at the attractions. Briefly, multinational travel, which is ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72277227723 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36763063203 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646864686469 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3925029641 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.384615385 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0366152914554 0.244688304435 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0139806840723 0.084324248473 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211922766255 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0237636668173 0.151304729494 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176811738231 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.