Blood rain
The article and the lecture focus on the blood rain phenomenon. The author of the article presents three theories explaining the color of these rains. The lecturer disputes the claims made in the article. His position is that there is no sufficient evidence that supports those explanations.
In the reading, the author begins by stating that the ash from volcano eruption could result in blood rains. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that in this case there should be acid rain detected, but it does not.
Secondly, the author suggests that the meteor explosion could be the reason for the blood rains. In the article, it is said that citizens of Kerala, where the last blood rain was registered, saw a bright light, and heard thunder before the rain came. And the light and thunder could be considered as evidence of such an explosion. The lecturer, however, asserts that if meteor explosion was the reason for the blood rain, the area, covered by the rain, would be much bigger and yet it does not.
Finally, another reason why the blood rains appear is the release of the lichen spores. The professor is doubtful that this is an accurate conclusion. He suggests that these spores are located near the ground, and there is no evidence that they can be gathered in the atmosphere and made the rain red.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...es explaining the color of these rains. The lecturer disputes the claims made in th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 231.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83982683983 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39121754098 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52380952381 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.3779159756 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8571428571 110.228320801 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35714285714 7.06452816374 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422731056833 0.272083759551 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14030466535 0.0996497079465 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156481258842 0.0662205650399 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253162892511 0.162205337803 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806350500286 0.0443174109184 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.3589403974 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.