In spite of the advance made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about the problem?
It is generally known that although the improvements in agriculture is a reality that we cannot deny, underprivileged people out of there are still starving. This problem happens because of lack of management and the number of fraud cases which is conducted by some people in government and people who in charge of this issue.
Management of agricultural products is the top priority to overcome starving cases in the world. In my experience of making discussion with the farmers in some villages in Central Java, I found a lack of knowledge about the management of agricultural products. Most of farmers in that area have a low educational level that which made their products were not manageable. In fact, the government was not seriuously tackle this problem. For example, people in charge did not control the process of agriculture and the sales of products such us vegetables, rice, fruits and other crops. In addition, some individual in the government who did corruptions are the next issue that is difficult to overcome except by the government itself.
To overcome this issues, educational way and regulation may boost the quality of agricultural management in order to solve starving cases. First, people who are responsible for this field need to educate every people who are engaged in agricultural bussiness. For example, the government should give the farmers a knowledge of management in agriculture and monitor them until they are independent. Secondly, the strict regulation of fraud in this agricultural affairs must be revitalized and implemented.
In conclusion, even though management and fraud is the main factor to cause starving even the agricultural technology has been become sophisticated, education of management to farmers and people who are involved and implementation of strict regulation to fraud law are two possible solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-14 | ruang imaji | 56 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | ruang imaji | 56 | view |
- In spite of the advance made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about the problem 56
- some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals other say that there are more important environmental problems discuss both these views and give your own opinion
- Some people say that musis is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- in spite of advance made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry why is this the case what can be done about the problem 56
- some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals other say that there are more important environmental problems discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the farmers') or simply say ''Most farmers''.
Suggestion: Most of the farmers; Most farmers
...he management of agricultural products. Most of farmers in that area have a low educational lev...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34576271186 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1189682956 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505084745763 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0213884097 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196465755478 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772991030116 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045764152031 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125922390066 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552941782929 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.