The chart below shows the results of survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.

The chart illustrates the survey results of people who purchasing coffee and tea also drinking habits in five different cities of Australia “Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart”

Overall, Most of Australian cities, people are preferring to go a café for coffee as last 4 weeks it occupied the highest percentage at the chart, in the meantime, all cities have the lowest rate of people who purchased fresh coffee in the same period.

First of all, bought fresh coffee in last 4 weeks in Sydney was about 61%, while it was around 63% in Melbourne and Hobart respectively. Brisbane and Adelaide were the lowest percentage of city residents for buying fresh coffee as they recorded almost 50%.

Secondly, regarding to people who bought instant coffee in last 4 weeks. Brisbane and Hobart hit the highest amount of instant coffee between the other cities as they were between 50% to 55%, however other cities were below 50%.
Lastly, went to a café for drinking coffee or tea were the highest rate in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, and Hobart, as the all these cities was above 55%, although Adelaide was the lowest between them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-10 nobitaa 73 view
2024-08-10 nobitaa 67 view
2024-08-10 nobitaa 67 view
2024-07-09 nguyendangquang.aspect 78 view
2024-04-13 soomi2209 73 view
Essays by user eslamyousry :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...rall, Most of Australian cities, people are preferring to go a café for coffee as last 4 weeks...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, lastly, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04712041885 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48423664416 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51832460733 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.754685658 43.030603864 288% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8333333333 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.3333333333 5.23603664747 274% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328420717408 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143346526558 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105448802461 0.0843802449381 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189556035114 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107753870298 0.0819641961636 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.4329268293 232% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 27.0 11.0658536585 244% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.