Many people believe that it’s better to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s world, there is a public debate about the way to learn something. It is believed that learning in a group is better than individual learning. From my perspective, I am utterly convinced that learning in a group is better.
To begin with, the most frequent factor contributing to this view is that this method can increase the quality of information absorbed by students. In fact, some studies in this field suggest that group assignments do indeed directly improve an individual ability to learn and perform. “Socially shared cognition” and “transactive memory” are some of the loftier terms used to describe groups working together. It makes sense that information discussed and delivered by friends and colleagues will be more salient than the same information intake by oneself. For this reason, it is obvious that learning in a group is better to acquire the information.
In addition, one explanation to support this statement is that students can learn the good sides of others during the time working together. Take myself as an example. Last month, I participated in a group project to accomplish the slides about strategies to get a high mark in studying. Because of the influence of other members in the group by their behaviours, I have changed my lifestyle and become more self-disciplined as well as punctual than before. As this example reveals, studying in a group is a good way for students rather than alone studying.
Given the aforementioned points, it may be concluded that there are many merits of studying in a group, which individual learning cannot bring, making this method be better than alone learning. Therefore, I totally agree with this claim.
- The maps show the art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Many people believe that in order to have clean and tidy streets in their neighbourhood this should be the residents responsibility while others think it should be the government s duty What is your opinion 56
- People are living in a throwaway society using things for a short time and then throwing them away What are the causes of this What problems does it lead to 89
- People are consuming more and more sugar based drinks Why What can be done to reduce sugary drink consumption 91
- Compare the town of Brindell and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ced that learning in a group is better. To begin with, the most frequent factor ...
^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...cognition” and “transactive memory” are some of the loftier terms used to describe groups w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p is better to acquire the information. In addition, one explanation to support ...
^^^
Line 4, column 446, Rule ID: AS_ADJ_AS[1]
Message: Comparison is written "as punctual 'as'".
Suggestion: as
...re self-disciplined as well as punctual than before. As this example reveals, studyi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, well, in addition, in fact, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12230215827 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94916648239 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.557553956835 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.032136673 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291812519735 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104059968851 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111334338941 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193157957586 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739817803489 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.