The diagram below shows the number of marriages in the UK between 1951 and 2001. The data given is for all marriages, remarriages (any partner) and first marriages. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates how many marriages were there in the UK from 1951 to 2001. Besides, these data are about both all marriages, remarriages and first marriages.
A cursory at the diagram is enough to make it clear that over the given period, the number of first marriages and all marriages had parallel trends.
According to the diagram, there were nearly 100 thousand remarriages in 1951. After this year, it slightly decreased in 1961 then increased minimally to over 100 thousand in 1981. After that period, this figure declined again in 2001 which was almost the same as the figure in 1951.
As the diagram suggests, in 1951, there were roughly 350 first marriages. Moreover, the next 330 years witnessed a marginal climb to more than 400 thousand in this number. However, after 1981, this figure went down gradually to closely 300 thousand in 2001.
In addition, the number of all marriages experienced the same trend as the figure of first marriages. Firstly, it stood at 450 thousand in 1951. Following this year, it hit the peak at approximately 550 thousand in 1981. Afterwards, it saw a steady reduction by about 100 thousand in 2001.
Overall, it is obvious that over the period given, the number of remarriages stayed the same. Meanwhile, the figure for first marriages went down significantly.
- Research into new types of medicine and treatments are essential for improving health and deal with diseases Who do you think should fund these researches private companies individuals or governments Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant e 73
- Cultural and historical education gained through museums and can also be gained through the Internet Museums should be closed to give way to the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that government spending on the restoration of old buildings in cities should be stopped Instead they should spend the money on housing and road development To what extent do you agree 67
- Some people think that one of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99095022624 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63017783147 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.7557074648 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.5333333333 112.824112599 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7333333333 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269557402425 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985568260984 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874137118175 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169782912836 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880394353795 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.07 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.