The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in Australia, divided into three categories, from 2001- 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart elucidates the total number of minutes of Australian telephone calls in billions by separating them into three varieties of categories over 7 years periods from 2001 to 2008.
Overall, despite the number of local phone calls were dominant rather than national and international calls, its rate remained the same with the exception of some increases over the years, and the least number of telephone calls were mobile in this period.
To begin with, it is evident that the Australian nations highly prefer doing local calls and the total amount of them was 72 billion at the beginning of the year whilst national and worldwide calls made up 38 billion at the same time. Subsequently, these amounts remarkably climbed to 90 billion for local rings in 2005, over four years, and 61 billion for national and international rings at the end of the year. However, local phone rings slightly fell to their first quantity which was 72 billion from 2006 to 2008.
Moreover, mobile telephone rings were the least preferred among Australian citizens by only 2 billion in 2001, however, they also accelerated to 46 billion after 7 years in 2008.
- Society is based on rules and laws If individuals were free to do whatever they want to do it could not function To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 67
- The pie charts below show the percentage of housing owned and rented in the UK in 1991 and 2007 73
- Due to increasing world demands for oil and gas energy people need to look for new sources of energy in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages of locating these sources outweigh disadvantages of damaging these places 67
- The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 78
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to sa 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 137, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...ional calls, its rate remained the same with the exception of some increases over the years, and the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, so, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9792746114 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53164884725 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564766839378 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.2689225992 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.166666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 5.23603664747 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223268952844 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131654983176 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120730632942 0.0843802449381 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171993225751 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130373519266 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.