Today children are spending much more time watching TV compared to the past. Why do you think this happens? Is this a positive or a negative change?
TV is a priority need of every household in the modern world. However, it’s an undeniable fact that the youth today, are investing enormous amount of duration in front of the television. Researchers believe that this behavioural pattern has adverse effects on children. This essay will show how globalisation and the ineffective parents of the children are the reasons behind this cause.
First and foremost, globalisation can be blamed for the long-term watching patterns of children. For instance, due to modernisation, more number of buildings have been constructed, having very little space for extra-curricular activities for the youth. On top of that, the government does very little to provide facilities such as an open ground, or a park for some physical exercises. Thus, the only option of entertainment is the idiot box. Having no physical activity causes obesity at an early age. Also, laziness is one of the main attributes which becomes a part of their nature.
In addition to that, lack of parental monitoring is another reason for this cause. Today, where both, the father and the mother go to work, children have fewer restrictions. As a result, they take advantage of this scenario and watch as much TV as they want. Moreover, this harms their body. According to research, by the age of ten, 90% of children start wearing glasses.
Having analyzed the above statements, it can be said that due to globalization by main scale industries, as well as the absence of parental guidance, children spend a lot of time with TV. This in turn has negative impacts, harming their body in numerous ways, as well as their nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | murtaza | 73 | view |
| 2020-11-20 | santhip123 | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-21 | Rishiraj Kansara | 90 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | faisal vhora | 77 | view |
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Producing clean energy is an impossible goal Instead we need to focus on reducing energy consumption How far do you agree with this statement Support your views with justification and examples 55
- Some people believe that restoration of old buildings costs too much we should demolish them and build new ones instead To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn 78
- It is inevitable that as technology develops so traditional cultures must be lost Technology and tradition are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1378.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06617647059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87866473215 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3376995305 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.0588235294 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223173931621 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655610953816 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054953671508 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142391935312 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680836483262 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.