The internet means that people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live.
Do you agree or disagree?
The internet is a fantastic invention of the twentieth century that, thanks to modern technologies, gives us uncountable opportunities for getting information in different fields of science, including traveling. However, there are different opinions on whether the web is really that useful for learning the ways people live in foreign countries.
One point bases on the fact that the internet has billions of websites, where everybody can post whatever they want. Eventually, such pages become databases that can provide anybody with very comprehensive information about every part of people’s lives in every distant corner of the Earth. To some extent, it is hard to disagree with this claim: in fact, millions of websites consist of information about how people live all over the world. To be specific, needless to consider the hard time we are all in nowadays. All the world is obligated to stay at home due to the quarantine, and I am not an exception. Because of this, I have used the Internet very much recently and I have seen a sea of websites that fit the mentioned description. For example, using videos on YouTube I acquired plenty of knowledge about the way people live in the Oceania islands. For sure, I would never do this without the web. Therefore, the Internet is definitely a great tool for exploring the world.
Nonetheless, there is another point of view based on the idea that the Internet fails to convey feelings and emotions. It is suggested that even though there is a great multitude of information on the Internet, it cannot give a precise description of how people live abroad because there is no way to understand emotions without interacting with people. This point, of course, also has the right to exist. Indeed, it is impossible to transfer feelings through the computer. After learning Oceania through the internet, I agree with this point of view too, because I feel that my knowledge is a bit unfinished, incomplete due to the lack of contact with native people.
Consequently, I can conclude that the given issue is very complicated. The internet can help us explore the world without spending money and time on traveling, but it cannot show the full range of information: something is doomed to be missed even with the use of the latest technology. Respectively, I cannot either agree or disagree with the given statement.
- The reading passage suggests that R robustus was a scavenger However the professor contends that it a hunter 81
- Computer games are a waste of time Do you agree or disagree 70
- The diagram details the process by which pots made from ceramics are manufactured 89
- The table gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Do you agree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...ss to consider the hard time we are all in nowadays. All the world is obligated to stay at ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, for example, i feel, in fact, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1974.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98484848485 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83712093116 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 618.680645161 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1517395154 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.894736842 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17532926713 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482341247094 0.076458572812 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427092900562 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948975611785 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298580285197 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.