Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some people are of belief that we must be farsighted, so as to obtain targeted goals and thus, should aim for solving future problems. The prompt attempt to address this issue by proposing that government must focus on solving future problems rather than focusing upon present scenario. However, I mostly disagree with this notion and believe that the cardinal focus of the government should be on mitigating present difficulties because of following two reasons. Nonetheless, I do concede in a few situations that aiming on solving future problems may be fruitful.
To embark, the primary role of government is to get focused upon contemporary issues because the government should give priority to the present needs and demands of public. Without fulfilling the present demands of the public, a nation cannot progress towards development. For instance, North Korean government does not focus on the present problems of their people like food insecurity, diseases and poverty, etc. As a result, the country has not been able to uplift their development. In addition, if government does not focus on the present issues like Covid-19 pandemic, the virus will make the darkest side of our future. So, there are many examples that resulted a bitter future on neglecting present problems.
The future outcome is based upon the present contributions. For instance, if the government focus upon solving health problems of the situation, this will lead to develop healthier and energetic manpower for the country. For example, the government if does not formulate and implement a strict rules and regulations against rapist, subsequently the rape cases in the country will increase relentlessly. Hence, it is advisable for government to focus on the present problems.
However, the government should focus on the future plans and policies regarding future problems. For instance, climate change is suspected to bring many adverse consequences in near future. For which many of the countries and organizations are working for saving the future. Similarly, many governments are investing upon renewable sources of energy for saving non-renewable sources like petrolium products and mine.
To sum up, though some people find that it is reasonable for governments to focus on future problems, I suggest to focus upon present scenario and problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-11 | guozhishan | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | sami18 | 79 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | shekhar | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-09 | Fahim Shahriar Khan | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 50 | view |
- Is an amusement park better to construct in the city to attract tourists 66
- Claim The emergence of the online blogosphere has significantly weakened the quality of political discourse in the United States Reason When anyone can publish political opinions easily standards for covering news and political topics will inevitably decl 66
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 57
- Air purifier 76
- Shakespeare s literary works 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e of belief that we must be farsighted, so as to obtain targeted goals and thus, should ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, similarly, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1985.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40871934605 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84473362735 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49863760218 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2111062737 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.473684211 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3157894737 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57894736842 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207950118603 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733522064976 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612772795718 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125332661409 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658194676 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.