Stone Age cutting tools
The two pictures illustrate the basic differences of the Stone Age cutting tools used 1.4 million and 0.8 million years ago.
Overall, there are remarkable differences in terms of the shape and sophistication of these so-called hand axes.
The pictures of tool A depict a cutting tool dating back to 1.6 million years ago. This tool has a length of about 10 centimeters and rough surfaces. It has no appropriate shape crafted for cutting or smashing which proves the poor workmanship of people at that time. Although this handed axe has a relatively pointed end, its edges are not well-processed which could result in discomfort for users.
The pictures of tool B illustrate a well-shaped cutting tool used 0.8 million years ago. This tool has a length of over 10 centimeters and flat surfaces. It has a tear-drop shape with a pointed end and rounded handle. Since it is shaped symmetrical along its longitudinal axis its mass is equally distributed to the whole tool which makes it perfectly balanced. It is also a double-edged axe with edges sharpened to serve the purpose of butchering animals and chopping wood.
- Stone Age cutting tools 78
- Some people think that robots are very important to human s future development Others however argue that they are dangerous and have negative impacts on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Stone Age cutting tools 78
- Every year an increasing number of people suffer from fast food related diseases The government therefore should impose a high tax on fast food To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: distinguishable
... reveals that the two cutting tools are distinguishable in shape and sophistication, but similar in the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00546448087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89783435289 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.1197638011 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226936452286 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934275845968 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815218734473 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136072347411 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0480582371144 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.