The bar charts compare how many people in urban and rural areas were affected by noise pollution from four sources during daytime and nightime in 2007.
Overall, it is clear that more people in cities experienced all types of noise pollution compared with rural areas. In both charts, traffic was the main source of noise pollution at all times.
Daytime noise from traffic affected 64 million people in cities and 34 million in rural areas. At night, traffic noise affected 48 million city residents, double the figure for rural areas. Noise pollution caused by trains affected slightly more people in cities compared with rural areas, at 10 million and 8 million respectively during the daytime, and 8 million and 6 million respectively at night.
The remaining two sources of noise pollution were less significant. In cities, daytime aircraft noise affected 4 million people and half that number in rural areas. The figure at night for cities and rural areas was 1 million. Those living in rural areas were not affected by noise from industry. However, 1 million city residents experienced industrial noise pollution in the daytime, four times the number affected at night.
The bar charts compare how many people in urban and rural areas were affected by noise pollution from four sources during daytime and nightime in 2007.
Overall, it is clear that more people in cities experienced all types of noise pollution compared with rural areas. In both charts, traffic was the main source of noise pollution at all times.
Daytime noise from traffic affected 64 million people in cities and 34 million in rural areas. At night, traffic noise affected 48 million city residents, double the figure for rural areas. Noise pollution caused by trains affected slightly more people in cities compared with rural areas, at 10 million and 8 million respectively during the daytime, and 8 million and 6 million respectively at night.
The remaining two sources of noise pollution were less significant. In cities, daytime aircraft noise affected 4 million people and half that number in rural areas. The figure at night for cities and rural areas was 1 million. Those living in rural areas were not affected by noise from industry. However, 1 million city residents experienced industrial noise pollution in the daytime, four times the number affected at night.
- It is true that people who have a reference for reading rather than watching TV usually have more lively imaginations and sharped language skill While many people oppose to this idea I strongly agree with this view On the one hand I advocate that reading 67
- There is a widespread saying that books and novels spur the imagination and language skills much more than any TV programme I believe that this notion holds true no matter what modern technologies are used on TV and TV media production The reasons are sim 84
- The bar chart illustrates the amount of money spent on three different kinds of clothes per person in the US from 1985 to 2005 It is evident that women and men spend on attire more than boys and girls Besides the average expenditure on clothes grew gradua 61
- It is obvious that nowadays there is an increasing number of people purchasing well known designer labels of consumer products While this trend can account for some primary reasons I strongly believe that this is a negative tendency There are two principa 78
- The idea that nowadays new staff in a particular company licking fundamental interpersonal skills are widespread There are several possible reasons behind this phenomenon and steps need to be taken to tackle these problems There are two primary reasons wh 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11398963731 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4480864634 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.445595854922 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.492974626 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7272727273 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.36363636364 5.23603664747 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.544079655242 0.215688989381 252% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.268395010809 0.103423049105 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189021798997 0.0843802449381 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.453772854673 0.15604864568 291% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193322053347 0.0819641961636 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.