Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is argued if minority languages should be supported by governments with public funds. Some opine that it is the only way to prevent these languages from extinction, while others believe that it is costly to expend an abundance of money to solve. In my opinion, the first argument has the advantageous effects of contributing and developing the outlook of languages.
On the one hand, the languages play a crucial role in creating the distinct and special attractions of the nation for the following rationales. Thanks to them, the records from one generation to other generations in order that the future generations can develop or receive more information and experiment form forefathers. The language of each nation is the special symbol as well as a tool to distinguish one thing from others. Simultaneously, the literature works, such as poems, novels, short stories will have more opportunities to succeed in the future growth by preserving the variety of languages- the tool maintaining the meaning and messages to other countries. This method can connect people all over the globe and contribute to good relationships between many lands of the world. Consequently, the languages need public intervention to deal with extinction.
On the other hand, opponents of public financial aid state that it is proved that investing in minority languages is wasteful. Learning and communicating via the languages require advanced conditions, like materials, facilities, instruction and pupils, to grow and sustain perfectly; nonetheless, the states have to spend a great amount of money and time on them. This expenditure is not necessary for languages spoken from a little amount of people in the globe. By contrast, governments should invest in famous languages, like English, Chinese or Spanish in order to make relations between the nations more nearly and learn the good habits to enhance the culture of other nations.
In conclusion, despite justifying the disappearance of languages, governments should develop the minority languages in order to learn in individuals their role in human race.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-03 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | @@stranger0122 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-01 | idid382002 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | lore4129 | 70 | view |
- It is suggested that primary school children should learn how to grow vegetables and keep animals Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In many workplaces online communication is getting more common than meeting face to face Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The diagram shows how the glass is recycled
- It is not necessary for people to travel to other places to learn about the culture We can learn as much as from books films and the Internet To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd developing the outlook of languages. On the one hand, the languages play a cr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 684, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o enhance the culture of other nations. In conclusion, despite justifying the di...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, look, nonetheless, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36858006042 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0531268251 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1432485308 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.928571429 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6428571429 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209100908089 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0701803936703 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038310384881 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127640619757 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04397067775 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.