Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Concerning the nerve-wracking issue related to the environment, several people these days hold the belief that authorities and large enterprises are the exclusive factors that can make a contribution to preserving and recovering our environment since scarcely anything a singular person can do. From my perspective, while the merits of governments and colossal organizations are undeniable, effective environment conservation requires concerted efforts of people from every segment of the society
To initiate, there is a variety of explanation to support that only government and large companies can make a difference in improving the environment. One fundamental justification is that they are the only subjects that have sufficient financial resource as well as human power to implement projects on the national or international scale. By the way of exemplifying, afforestation campaigns, which cost up to an enormous amount of money that no single individual can afford, are being conducted by several ministries with the aim of combating deforestation. Another justification is that the government can use the legislation system to enforce punishment against the act of damaging the environment, thereby decreasing the potential damages of human activities
Nevertheless, the contribution of each individual on the process of improving the environment should not be underestimated. First and foremost, all aforementioned projects will be considered as meaningless if the majority of citizens are not fully aware of the importance of the environment and the deteriorative activities such as the discharging of wastewater and emissions from households continue. On the second place, humble activities may result in tremendous impacts if they were done coordinatedly. Ocean cleanup can be a suitable case in point. Ocean cleanup campaigns can be a suitable case in point. Plenty of seashores has returned to the original cleanliness thanks to the outstanding endeavour of volunteers and non-government organization
In conclusion, whilst governments and large companies can make a great contribution to protecting the environment at a macro level through colossal projects and legislation system, the concerted effort of each individual is necessary in order to make a difference
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 84
- What are the possible effects of living long on an individual and on the whole society 83
- Some people think that all lawbreaker should be put into prison while others believed that there are better alternatives Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year betweenfinishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages anddisadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 436, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires concerted" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'concerting' or 'to be concerted'.
Suggestion: concerting; to be concerted
...ctive environment conservation requires concerted efforts of people from every segment of...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people from every segment of the society To initiate, there is a variety of expla...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 8.3376753507 348% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1953.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77810650888 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5135437483 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562130177515 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 120.834970104 49.4020404114 245% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 195.3 106.682146367 183% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8 20.7667163134 163% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322250392317 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10794243174 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827615908327 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189707067303 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529279299094 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.7 13.0946893788 173% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 12.6 50.2224549098 25% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.7 11.3001002004 174% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.84 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.0 9.78957915832 225% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.