The graph below represents the total exports of clothing from 3 different countries over a time period.
The given line graph illustrates the total exports of clothing items from Colombia, Japan and Myanmar between 1990 and 2013.
Overall, all three countries experienced increases and declines in the export of clothing over time. However, Myanmar's fluctuations were more drastic compare to Japan and Columbia.
In 1990, While Myanmar had no exports of clothing, Colombia and Japan had similar export at around 450 million and 560 million. In the next ten years, Myanmar saw a rapid increase in international trade and had sales of clothing around 800 million. Colombia too saw a slight increase in export whereas, Japan's export figures dropped. Both countries had sales of around 500 million which was way lower than Myanmar. In 2011, all three counties experienced growth in exports. Myanmar's sales were the highest of all time period at around 930 million.
In 2012, Myanmar's exports of clothing significantly dropped by 600 million. Japan also, saw a slight decrease in international sales this year. On the other hand, Colombia's upwards trend continued and Colombia had 700 million sales. By 2013, while Colombia and Japan experiencing a decline, Myanmar saw a slight increase. Although was still the lowest exporter of clothes in 2013.
- Wealthy nations should assist poorer countries with humanitarian relief during natural disasters Do you agree or disagree 61
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 61
- Although more and more people read the news on the internet newspapers will remain the most important source of news To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other while others think that people have become more independent Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and the present 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to saw'?
Suggestion: to saw
...f clothing around 800 million. Colombia too saw a slight increase in export whereas, Ja...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 323, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...decline, Myanmar saw a slight increase. Although was still the lowest exporter of clothe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, whereas, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29797979798 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62259359092 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560606060606 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9940854758 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.9285714286 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1428571429 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192578209343 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773760091896 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854053713658 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152746625046 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631554662232 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.