Today, TV channels broadcast man’s sport shows more than women’s sport shows. Why? Should TV channels give equal showtime for women’s sport and men’s sport?
It is true that man’s sport shows are more popular in TV channel than women’s sport shows. There could be several reasons for this trend, and I claim that TV channels should balance two types of sport shows.
Granted, the sport shows have the attendance of men which is more interesting and thrilling, especially football. The rate of audience watching men football competitions is considerably higher than that of women, because of the fact that men possess speed and skills which are more outstanding than women. Another rationale is the main audiences of most TV channels are males. Therefore, they will prioritize programs which have a relatively high watching rate.
In my view, TV channels should balance show-time for women’s sport and men’s sport. In spite of the fact that there are no many women watching sport shows, the frequent schedule of them broadcast on TV channels will enhance the rate of female watching. It exerts positive effects on social health due to encouragement and inspiration of people joining in exercises. Furthermore to maintain gender equality, women should have the same show-time of shows on TV despite the low audience attraction. Vietnam, for example, has seen an equal sharing between women’s and men’s football shows on TV channel which are supported by government and society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-06 | viviannguyen | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | viviannguyen | 67 | view |
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagrams show the structure of solar panel and its use 67
- The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam 73
- The chart below shows the number and purposes of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 78
- The number of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...considerably higher than that of women, because of the fact that men possess speed and skills which are ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...rt. In spite of the fact that there are no many women watching sport shows, the fr...
^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...iration of people joining in exercises. Furthermore to maintain gender equality, women shou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, therefore, for example, in my view, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1121.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21395348837 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67919088873 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572093023256 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9345134404 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.909090909 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.594260282463 0.215688989381 276% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.243546718892 0.103423049105 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.196775516803 0.0843802449381 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.438458939947 0.15604864568 281% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131107597734 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.