Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The opinions of celebrities, such as famous entertainers and athletes, are more important to younger people than they are to older people.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
People possess different perspectives of whether the opinions of celebrities are more important to the youth than the elders. Some people think young people are easier to be influenced by others, while other people state that those opinions from famous people are important to all people. In my perspective, I agree with the statement.
First of all, young people tend to influence by celebrities since they lack of the ability of independent thinking. For example, when I was in high school, I was fascinated by rock band singer. I followed his dress code and hair style of rock band singer because I was a fan of him. Moreover, one day the singer expressed his opinion about smoking in his personal blog, he stated that when people start to smoke, it means that they are ready to grow up. For this reason, I started to smoke because it is important for me to take my idol's opinion seriously. On the other hand, people can think independently when they become an adult. Furthermore, people can distinguish the opinion of others even it is the opinion from famous people.
Second, the high frequency of young people exposing to entertainment and sport news makes them consider their opinions more seriously. To be more specific, young people enjoy having connections with their friends, because young people seek to have sense of identification. Discussing gossip news is the easier way to have common interest with other teenagers. Based on the British research for news topic selection, young people tend to focus on celebrities new while older people emphasize on the finance information. Generally speaking, the more you expose to the information about specific topics, the more you would be influenced by this information. Apparently, young people who are the royal readers of celebrities definitely would consider their opinions seriously.
In conclusion, the immature thinking and reading hobby of young people make them easier to accept opinions from famous people. That is the reason why I strongly agree with the statement that the opinions from famous people are more important for the youth than the elders.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | YasamanEsml | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-02 | Vivian Chang | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 70 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2023-03-27 | mzt123 | 70 | view |
- Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when they try to fly through glass windows T 65
- Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world From the fossil remains we know that agnostids were primitive arthropods relatives of modern day 85
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1977.66487455 90% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10601719198 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70597568625 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487106017192 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 549.9 618.680645161 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5715262306 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3888888889 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.45110844103 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357022224551 0.236089414692 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125311498294 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0790202316487 0.0737576698707 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252697489847 0.150856017488 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065059737223 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 86.8835125448 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.