Which one do you think is important to long-lasting friendship?
1, help you when you need
2, share same interest and hobby
3, mutual trust
Various ways definitely create long-lasting friendships. While some people consider the way to achieve long-lasting friendship as helping someone when they need it, other people share the same hobby and interest. Moreover, there is an alternative choice to cultivate mutual interest. It is so controvertible for people to decide on a specific method. In my view, people could obtain long-lasting friendships through the same hobby and interest. They can easily communicate with each other, start to be curious about others by this interest, and be getting into this hobby with each other.
To begin with, sharing the same intrigue and hobby among people can progress their friendship as long-lasting. People are inclined to talk about daily bases such as where they have been university, what they major in their school, what color they like, and so on. The conversation with them will not be profound if they figure out the same interest and hobby. On the other hand, once they find out the similar hobbies, they can expand their conversation more diverse. Therefore, they can establish a close friendship.
Secondly, the way for a long-lasting friendship to share the same intrigue among people boosts the curiosity about others. People have to comprehend a bunch of hooks to acquire close friends. One of them would be the same hobbies and interests. For example, my friend and I had met on the first day of school when I was a freshman at the university. Then, we could find out the same hobbies that we love watching the NBA and playing basketball from the beginning of school. From this experience, we had been watching an NBA game in the stadium for a graduation trip. Even after we graduated from university, we sometimes called each other to talk about the next season.
Finally, people can dive into the same interest to share it for a long-lasting relationship. They may realize plenty of other aspects they do not know about their hobbies when they detect the same hobby and interest with others. For instance, my friend loves to watch many movies from the United States, so she owns profound and proficient knowledge about them. However, after she attains a new friend who also likes watching them, she builds up her precise knowledge more deeply. Hence, they have become close friends soon after they share their interests.
To sum up, the best way to be a long-lasting relationship is to share the same interest and hobby. I surely believe that they can naturally communicate with each other, exploit the same hobby as the method to be curious about others, and interest in the excitement more deeply.
- After making a presentation in class you want to evaluate it Which of the following do you think would be better for you 1 Watch the recording by yourself 2 Invite other to discuss and give opinions 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement These days children spend more time on doing homework or participating in organized activities related to school or sports However they should be given more time to do whatever they want 75
- Which one do you think is important to long lasting friendship 1 Help you when you need 2 Share same interest and hobby 3 mutual trust 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Children rely too much on the technology like computers smart phones video games for fun and entertainment Playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s developmen 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The job has a greater effect on one s overall happiness than the social life does 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97954545455 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65842551892 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486363636364 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5332670642 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.64 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 11.8709677419 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197443521213 0.236089414692 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737409334461 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750004108426 0.0737576698707 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132580319477 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522010676947 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.