The Internet will never replace traditional course books in schools.
Do you agree or disagree with this prediction?
There is a vast range of resources available to adults and their children via the Internet, and the right selection of distance learning or self-study modules are an essential part of our life and education. Nevertheless, I agree with old-fashioned teachers that students with academic aspirations would not sift information, marshal facts, and assimilate knowledge correctly without traditional course books.
I want to quote an American author, educator, and public speaker, Oliver DeMille, “Books are better than television, the Internet, or the computer for educating and maintaining freedom.” He explained that a nation of people who write and read is a nation with the attention span to earn an education and free society if they choose. In other words, books will help form your own judgment without Internet propaganda and unreliable or misleading resources.
By the same token, books and conventional learning prosses were incorporated into schools hundreds of years ago by our ancestors for a good reason, and it can’t be changed at the moment. Pedagogical experts and university professors have designed such curriculum activities as formal examinations and continuous assessment with the higher purpose (to avoid dishonesty and fraudulence), and we can’t rule out books from these testing procedures.
On the other hand, pupils could enhance and develop their study skills and knowledge via the Internet, and it would be judged as a useful supplement to traditional curriculum plans. This means that it would be better if the majority part of national society will stop biased attitude to the modern learning process and start esteem autonomous learning. It is true that state community and traditional academic institutes indeed criticize passing any exams online. Regarding this statement, I would like to share an example of Proctoring Company, the biggest online examination provider, when you can’t start an exam before the company certificated your desk, room, and ID number.
In the final analysis, traditional books have not been replaced by the Internet for the next decades; however, it will be an integral part of further and higher education. No doubt digital resources and programs will be available for students at all schools worldwide, and it will help ameliorate skills and deliver effective lessons to young adults. Moreover, we don't have a generation that would grow up on online education, and we can't compare this from and traditional form of education effectively.
- Most citizens have the right to vote What do you believe is the type of background best suited for someone who will become a national leader A business background B legal background C military background 90
- The reading the painting cannot be attributed to Rembrandt The lecturer however suggests that painting could be created by Rembrandt 63
- The reading passage suggests that R robustus was a scavenger However the professor contends that it a hunter 81
- The graph show average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...little effect on our brain development. Nonetheless, the fast development of the...
^^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...More and more applications and programs are appearing nowadays: Wikipedia enables us to searc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, honestly, if, nonetheless, so, apart from, as for, it is true, to sum up, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 385.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05194805195 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4296068528 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76510067642 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561038961039 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.1066606875 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.5625 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0625 20.6045352989 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.45110844103 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183514767651 0.236089414692 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586670465613 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729345481215 0.0737576698707 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116548927801 0.150856017488 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101476970958 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.