Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Is it a positive or negative development ?
Nowadays, countries become more similar and advanced in technology and all other goods because people are able to buy the same products with all aspects anywhere in the world. I postulate this trend as a negative development and reasons behind this are explained in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, development of countries create many environment problems which shows a great negative impact. Firstly, in this modern era, countries has exchanged goods with each other and these goods exports through air and seas or oceans which causes emission of carbon dioxide and other harmful gases which create numerous problems for birds and especially for aquatic life and has create problem in inhalation for human beings. For instance, many technical products and other things like cell phones, minerals from ores and mines, oil like petrol, diesel from seas are export with foreign countries through air ways, ships and other vehicles. These all leads to air, water and land degradation. Secondly, if exchange of goods increase, then it also increases industrialization. For instance, industries release many harmful gases like methane, sulphur dioxide and so on in air and harmful chemicals like SCl2, ZnCl2 and so on in water, this causes breathing problem such as asthma and also may lead to the demolishing of aquatic life.
Moreover, the countries causes loss of their traditional culture also and in case of clothes, people like to wear new branded and stylish dresses rather than to wear their own traditional dresses. For instance, in today's modern era, people like to wear stylish jeans, shirts and trousers rather than to prefer traditional clothes such as which are prepare from "Khadi".
To conclude, according to my view of point, it has adverse negative impact which leads to many environment problems and demolish to tradition and culture of country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-25 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | HappyCandy | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | Tirne Hazen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | mitss99 | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | mitss99 | 67 | view |
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevent 73
- Some people think that school children should learn to grow food as well as cook along with their lessons What is your opinion about it 67
- Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages therefore it is a wastage of time to learn a foreign languages To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic Some people think this will be the death of grammar and spelling To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Communication through text messaging and other instant forms of online communication are short and basic Some people think this will be the death of grammar and spelling To what extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 385, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'created'.
Suggestion: created
...and especially for aquatic life and has create problem in inhalation for human beings....
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prepared'.
Suggestion: prepared
...r traditional clothes such as which are prepare from 'Khadi'. To conclude, a...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1579.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26333333333 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68529121119 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536666666667 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1387696914 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.545454545 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177982691015 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751953005295 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134806718789 0.0667982634062 202% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143463558558 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179558790414 0.056905535591 316% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.