Computers today can quickly and accurately translate languages, therefore it is a wastage of time to learn a foreign languages. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In today's modern era, technology become too vast, due to this, many electric gadgets such as computers can translate any language in a quick and accurate way. Therefore, some masses believe that, there is no need to learn foreign languages because it is a wastage of time. I completely disagree with this statement and the reasons behind this are explained in the paragraphs below.
To begin with, it is not a wastage of their precious time to learn about the languages of foreign countries because it becomes beneficial for all in numerous ways. First of all, if people learn foreign languages then they learn about the history, culture and tradition of those countries. This boost the knowledge and communication skills of masses in a great way. For instance, every nation have their books which represent about the country in deep such as western culture become too popular and every know about this culture and they follow this also. Due to this, many people change their thoughts and become open minded such as the discrimination and inequality between men and women become demolished because of this tradition.
In addition, if people know about the foreign languages, then this also leads to progression of a country also. Because, if government of a country knows about the mother tongue of another country then they communicate with each other easily. Due to this, their relationships become good and they start do work together. For instance, many foreign countries set up their companies and MNCs in India because Indians speak in English easily. Therefore, the productivity of both the countries proliferate with a great aspect. Because, they exchange their products and also share ideas with each other. Because of this, both the countries lead their progression. Indirectly, this also gives opportunity to unemployed people to get employed by working in these companies or MNCs.
To conclude, according to my outlook, learning foreign languages is necessary for young people because this gives them beneficial outcomes.
- The increase in people life expectancy means that they have to work older to pay for their retirement One alternative is that people start work at younger age Is this alternative positive or negative statement 56
- The film is a less important form of arts than literature and painting To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries often give financial aid to poor countries but it does not solve poverty So rich countries should give other types of help to poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Some people think that school children should learn to grow food as well as cook along with their lessons What is your opinion about it 67
- People buy a product if it fullfills their need there is no need for advertisement To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 350, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a great way" with adverb for "great"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...edge and communication skills of masses in a great way. For instance, every nation have their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 550, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...about this culture and they follow this also. Due to this, many people change their ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... also leads to progression of a country also. Because, if government of a country kn...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, so, then, therefore, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1708.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66528089503 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519756838906 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6562789173 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164885444678 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636666257881 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0848976558484 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13899822105 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10274708134 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.